Midterm aftermath: Florida tax relief redraws the cost of development
The votes are in. What comes next for business? This article is part of a four-part caa series exploring the post-election outlook for taxes, research funding, trade and growth across key regional markets.
Key points:
- • Amendment 3 received about 62% support, above Florida’s 60% threshold.
- • The annual assessment cap for commercial and rental property falls from 10% to 5% in 2027 for non-school levies.
- • Miami-Dade’s pre-election analysis projected about $386 million less in annual property tax revenue beginning October 2027 at unchanged rates.
November 2026 — Florida property tax relief will give commercial landlords a tighter limit on assessment increases while leaving local governments to address projected revenue losses. Amendment 3 on the November midterm ballot received about 62% support in unofficial returns, exceeding the state’s 60% threshold. It takes effect Jan. 1, 2027, and first applies to the 2027 tax roll.
Join us at caa’s upcoming leadership summits! These premier events bring together hundreds of public and private sector leaders to discuss the challenges and opportunities for businesses and investors. Find the next summit in a city near you!
The implications for developers extend beyond operating expenses. Before the vote, Miami-Dade estimated that the amendment’s combined provisions would reduce annual property tax collections by about $386 million beginning October 2027, assuming unchanged tax rates. Whether that reduction affects a particular development will depend on local budget decisions and how its supporting infrastructure is funded.
Read more: After the midterms, what’s next for taxes and trade?
What the cap does to a property bill
The amendment lowers the annual cap on assessment growth from 10% to 5% for non-homestead property, including commercial buildings and rentals, for levies other than school district taxes. The cap limits growth in assessed value; it does not guarantee a lower tax bill.
The change matters most when a property’s market value is high enough for the assessment cap to apply. In a flat market, the immediate benefit may be limited. Local tax rates, school levies and a property’s assessment history still shape the bill an owner receives.
Consider a warehouse assessed at $10 million whose market value rises enough to reach either assessment limit. At the old cap, its non-school assessment could reach $11 million. Under the new cap, it could rise to $10.5 million. At an illustrative non-school tax rate of 10 mills, or $10 per $1,000 of assessed value, the difference would be $5,000 for the year.
That example holds rates constant and assumes the property remains under the same assessment treatment. An ownership change can trigger reassessment. A buyer pricing a warehouse or apartment complex from the seller’s tax bill needs to account for that potential reset. New construction and qualifying improvements are subject to separate assessment rules, so developers should not assume the 5% cap limits the initial assessment of a completed project.
A tenant that reimburses its landlord for property taxes may also benefit, depending on the lease. For owners negotiating leases in Greater Fort Lauderdale or Palm Beach, the lower cap may improve predictability for one operating expense, even as insurance, maintenance and financing costs move independently.
Why local revenue losses grow in the second year
For qualifying homeowners who maintain permanent Florida residency as of Dec. 31, 2026, and establish homestead, Amendment 3 raises the exemption for non-school property taxes to as much as $150,000 of assessed value in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028.
People who establish residency starting in 2027 generally begin with a non-school exemption of up to $50,000 and become eligible for the higher exemption beginning with their fifth year of receiving the homestead exemption. The exemption reduces the value subject to tax. Dollar savings depend on the applicable rate and the property’s taxable value.
Florida TaxWatch, using estimates from the state’s Revenue Estimating Conference, puts the statewide reduction in local property taxes at about $4.93 billion in FY2027–28 and $8.71 billion the following year.
Those figures reflect the amendment’s combined effects, including the expanded homestead exemption, rather than the commercial assessment cap alone. They are projected reductions against a baseline, not adopted budget cuts. Elected officials still have to set tax rates and approve budgets.
The amendment also specifies uses for county and municipal property tax revenue, including infrastructure, public safety, debt obligations and government operations, while allowing expenditures approved by the relevant officials and governing bodies unless otherwise prohibited by state law.
What Florida property tax relief means for development
The tax change arrives in a state that added nearly 197,000 residents in the year through July 2025, according to the latest U.S. Census Bureau data, bringing its population to about 23.5 million. Census data also show authorizations for about 178,000 housing units in Florida in 2025.
The connection between public funding and development feasibility has already been part of local discussions leading up to the vote. In a July interview with Invest: Tampa Bay, Tampa Community Redevelopment Agency Director Cedric McCray described assistance for projects needing stormwater improvements and other infrastructure work while pointing out the downsides of these property tax changes.
“It could reduce the funding that municipalities rely on, and it could affect the amount we collect through TIF to reinvest into community redevelopment areas. It could also affect basic services for residents, including infrastructure and other core city functions,” said McCray.
What owners should watch next
The next decisions will come through implementation guidance, local tax rates, county revenue forecasts and proposed capital plans. Those documents will show how officials intend to balance Florida property tax relief with service needs and infrastructure commitments.
Read more in this series:
Texas exporters face USMCA comment deadline
What Federal research funding deadline means for lab budgets
North Carolina income tax cap puts growth costs in focus
Want more? Read the Invest: reports.
