Invest Tampa Bay: Rays’ Stadium deal a go. What’s next?
Key points:
- • Hillsborough County voted 5-2 to approve $796 million for a $2.3 billion Rays stadium.
- • Tampa’s City Council approved the city’s $80 million share in a narrow 4-3 vote.
- • The Rays will contribute more than $1.3 billion and aim to open for the 2029 season.
October 2026 — Tampa Bay has cleared the local votes needed to build a $2.3 billion home for the Rays, turning years of debate into a financing plan with a firm 2029 target. Invest Tampa Bay news centers on the Hillsborough County Commission’s 5-2 vote in late August approving a $796 million county contribution to the stadium project, Bay News 9 reported, one day after the Tampa City Council narrowly approved the city’s $80 million share.
What is next in the pitch toward 2029?
Join us at caa’s upcoming leadership summits! These premier events bring together hundreds of public and private sector leaders to discuss the challenges and opportunities for businesses and investors. Find the next summit in a city near you!
Financing structure across revenue streams
The financing structure spreads the public share across several revenue streams. The Rays organization is contributing more than $1.3 billion. The county’s portion includes $360 million in Community Investment Tax funds, $303 million in Tourist Development Tax bonds and reserves and $103 million in other county resources, with the city adding $80 million. The remainder will come from other public funds, investment earnings and federal funds. Leaning on tourist development taxes ties a significant share of the county’s contribution to visitor spending rather than general revenue, a structure common in stadium deals nationwide. For county residents, that mix means much of the public contribution is drawn from dedicated revenue sources rather than general property tax revenue.
The stadium will rise on the Hillsborough Community College campus on Dale Mabry Highway, and team officials intend to move in by the 2029 season. Rays CEO Ken Babby described the outcome as the start of a privately financed, mixed-use neighborhood, framing the project as a district rather than a ballpark alone.
A mixed-use development can bring residential, retail and hospitality opportunities around the stadium and extend economic activity well beyond game days. The campus location also places the stadium along one of Tampa’s most heavily traveled corridors, which raises both the visibility of the district and the importance of traffic and parking planning as designs take shape.
The votes were close enough to show the deal’s political fragility. On the county commission, Ken Hagan, Harry Cohen, Gwen Myers, Chris Boles and Christine Miller voted yes, while Joshua Wostal and Donna Cepeda voted no; Boles’ support came with an amendment addressing the length and amount of the collective bargaining agreement. At City Hall a day earlier, the council split 4-3, with Alan Clendenin, Naya Young, Luis Viera and Bill Carlson in favor and Charlie Miranda, Guido Maniscalco and Lynn Hurtak opposed. Carlson reversed his earlier opposition, citing improved terms compared with the original proposal, Bay News 9 reported from the council vote.
Officials on both sides framed the result as a compromise. County Attorney Julia Mandell acknowledged that neither the county nor the Rays got everything it wanted, describing the outcome as the product of negotiation. Rays managing partner and co-chair Patrick Zalupski called the process long and challenging and noted that transformational projects rarely come easily. Tampa Mayor Jane Castor praised council supporters and said the project would create jobs, spur investment and deliver lasting benefits for the city.
Managing public skepticism
Public skepticism remains a factor the team and local governments will have to manage. During a two-hour public comment period at the city council meeting, opponents objected to using taxpayer money for the project, while supporters emphasized jobs and community development.
At the county meeting, residents worried that stadium dollars could divert funding from other priorities, including roads. Councilman Miranda argued the deal shortchanges taxpayers by making the city a financial pass-through. Those concerns are likely to resurface every time the project reaches a budget or schedule milestone.
For the region’s business community, the approvals change the planning horizon. Construction on a project of this scale supports contractors, suppliers and workers for years before opening day, and a mixed-use district on Dale Mabry would add a major new development node in the middle of Tampa. Hospitality operators, restaurateurs and commercial landlords near the site now have a date to plan around, and corporate recruiters gain a marquee amenity to feature when pitching the region. The deal also keeps Major League Baseball in the market, preserving a brand that Tampa Bay’s tourism and economic development efforts have long leaned on.
The next phase shifts from politics to execution, including the final agreements among the Rays, the county, and the city, the award of construction contracts, and the first details of the mixed-use program surrounding the ballpark, from residential units to retail and office space.
The 2029 move-in target leaves little room for delay, so any slippage in design, permitting, or financing will be an early warning sign.
Want more? Read the Invest: Tampa Bay report.
